Re: The Wikileaks Question
Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2019 9:17 pm
I just barfed a littlePhilosopher Stefan Molyneux
What you don't know can't hurt them.
https://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/
https://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?t=30362
I just barfed a littlePhilosopher Stefan Molyneux
Not sure how to embed twitters of whatever...This video is the most important thing you can watch when it comes to WikiLeaks and Assange:
exxon mobil fuel stationsCurrie Dobson
https://twitter.com/Ventuckyspaz/status ... 6087324673
@Ventuckyspaz
9h9 hours ago
This video was shared with me that @TulsiGabbard tweeted and then apparently quickly deleted. I'm going to guess democratic leadership threatened her. Trump isn't the threat, it's the democratic party. Tulsi makes this clear.
#Tulsi2020 #LeadWithLove
https://youtu.be/Hl2DrWx1KfE
Indeed. But surely "philosopher" is just funny. Now if he can incidentally be for the right thing from over in his corner, there's no need to get in bed with him, just let him keep doing that.cptmarginal » Fri Apr 26, 2019 8:17 pm wrote:I just barfed a littlePhilosopher Stefan Molyneux
Assange's sentencing statement from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-48118908I apologise unreservedly to those who consider that I have disrespected them by the way I have pursued my case.
This is not what I wanted or intended.
I found myself struggling with terrifying circumstances for which neither I nor those from whom I sought advice could work out any remedy.
I did what I thought at the time was the best and perhaps the only thing that could be done - which I hoped might lead to a legal resolution being reached between Ecuador and Sweden that would protect me from the worst of my fears.
I regret the course that this took; the difficulties were instead compounded and impacted upon very many others.
Whilst the difficulties I now face may have become even greater, nevertheless it is right for me to say this now.
Socrates was in no small measure a fictional character who might possibly have been a likeable guy. Or not. I mean, which philosopher would YOU want to have a beer with?JackRiddler » Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:24 am wrote:Ah yes, I see. Zizek has kind of redefined philosopher, though I hope not enough to allow Molyneux under that umbrella. Though, I guess it's not really a redefinition. Messy wacko drugged up guy willing to say anything contrarian and perform stunt sophistry for the attention sounds like what philosophers have been going way back, I guess?
Wurd!Irony is everywhere now that everything is undeniably poisoned.
I feel like that comic who died in the middle of his routine.
to the sound of mistaken laughter
The Consul » 01 May 2019 23:19 wrote:Socrates was in no small measure a fictional character who might possibly have been a likeable guy. Or not. I mean, which philosopher would YOU want to have a beer with?JackRiddler » Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:24 am wrote:Ah yes, I see. Zizek has kind of redefined philosopher, though I hope not enough to allow Molyneux under that umbrella. Though, I guess it's not really a redefinition. Messy wacko drugged up guy willing to say anything contrarian and perform stunt sophistry for the attention sounds like what philosophers have been going way back, I guess?
50 weeks in jail for skipping bail? Without any credit for time already effectively served?liminalOyster » 01 May 2019 21:53 wrote:I find this admirable and sad:
Assange's sentencing statement from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-48118908I apologise unreservedly to those who consider that I have disrespected them by the way I have pursued my case.
This is not what I wanted or intended.
I found myself struggling with terrifying circumstances for which neither I nor those from whom I sought advice could work out any remedy.
I did what I thought at the time was the best and perhaps the only thing that could be done - which I hoped might lead to a legal resolution being reached between Ecuador and Sweden that would protect me from the worst of my fears.
I regret the course that this took; the difficulties were instead compounded and impacted upon very many others.
Whilst the difficulties I now face may have become even greater, nevertheless it is right for me to say this now.
They don't bother to even pretend. The fix is in. Next up, they're going to railroad the extradition. I sure hope the legal team is in tip top shape.stickdog99 » Thu May 02, 2019 6:27 am wrote:50 weeks in jail for skipping bail? Without any credit for time already effectively served?liminalOyster » 01 May 2019 21:53 wrote:I find this admirable and sad:
Assange's sentencing statement from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-48118908I apologise unreservedly to those who consider that I have disrespected them by the way I have pursued my case.
This is not what I wanted or intended.
I found myself struggling with terrifying circumstances for which neither I nor those from whom I sought advice could work out any remedy.
I did what I thought at the time was the best and perhaps the only thing that could be done - which I hoped might lead to a legal resolution being reached between Ecuador and Sweden that would protect me from the worst of my fears.
I regret the course that this took; the difficulties were instead compounded and impacted upon very many others.
Whilst the difficulties I now face may have become even greater, nevertheless it is right for me to say this now.

