Page 91 of 95

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2019 9:17 pm
by cptmarginal
Philosopher Stefan Molyneux
I just barfed a little

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:01 pm
by Grizzly
^^^ Hope you didn't swallow it...

Don't know much about the guy except I've listened to him once or twice wasn't that impressed. Other stuff though by fairbanks:
This video is the most important thing you can watch when it comes to WikiLeaks and Assange:
Not sure how to embed twitters of whatever...
Imageexxon mobil fuel stations
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This video is the most important thing you can watch when it comes to WikiLeaks and Assange: <a href="https://t.co/h8liwZsQws">pic.twitter.co ... Qws</a></p>— Cassandra Fairbanks (@CassandraRules) <a href="https://twitter.com/CassandraRules/stat ... tfw">April 14, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Fairbanks has another that is on her twit, above that's interesting:
Currie Dobson

https://twitter.com/Ventuckyspaz/status ... 6087324673
‏ @Ventuckyspaz
9h9 hours ago

This video was shared with me that @TulsiGabbard tweeted and then apparently quickly deleted. I'm going to guess democratic leadership threatened her. Trump isn't the threat, it's the democratic party. Tulsi makes this clear.
#Tulsi2020 #LeadWithLove
https://youtu.be/Hl2DrWx1KfE


IT PISSES ME OFF, THAT SHE DELETED THIS...

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2019 8:08 am
by JackRiddler
cptmarginal » Fri Apr 26, 2019 8:17 pm wrote:
Philosopher Stefan Molyneux
I just barfed a little
Indeed. But surely "philosopher" is just funny. Now if he can incidentally be for the right thing from over in his corner, there's no need to get in bed with him, just let him keep doing that.

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:14 am
by RocketMan
Coked Up Philosopher Raccoon inveighs on Assange...


Re: The Wikileaks Question

Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2019 7:24 am
by JackRiddler
Ah yes, I see. Zizek has kind of redefined philosopher, though I hope not enough to allow Molyneux under that umbrella. Though, I guess it's not really a redefinition. Messy wacko drugged up guy willing to say anything contrarian and perform stunt sophistry for the attention sounds like what philosophers have been going way back, I guess?

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Posted: Wed May 01, 2019 5:53 pm
by liminalOyster
I find this admirable and sad:
I apologise unreservedly to those who consider that I have disrespected them by the way I have pursued my case.

This is not what I wanted or intended.

I found myself struggling with terrifying circumstances for which neither I nor those from whom I sought advice could work out any remedy.

I did what I thought at the time was the best and perhaps the only thing that could be done - which I hoped might lead to a legal resolution being reached between Ecuador and Sweden that would protect me from the worst of my fears.

I regret the course that this took; the difficulties were instead compounded and impacted upon very many others.

Whilst the difficulties I now face may have become even greater, nevertheless it is right for me to say this now.
Assange's sentencing statement from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-48118908

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Posted: Wed May 01, 2019 7:19 pm
by The Consul
JackRiddler » Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:24 am wrote:Ah yes, I see. Zizek has kind of redefined philosopher, though I hope not enough to allow Molyneux under that umbrella. Though, I guess it's not really a redefinition. Messy wacko drugged up guy willing to say anything contrarian and perform stunt sophistry for the attention sounds like what philosophers have been going way back, I guess?
Socrates was in no small measure a fictional character who might possibly have been a likeable guy. Or not. I mean, which philosopher would YOU want to have a beer with?
What comes to us is water run over legions of lips
Like being the aging barmen of the Frolic Room telling stories (all lies) of Bukowski.who was Zizekesque, or maybe the other way around somewhat redefining literary in a similar vein as Zizik philosopy (though arguably that's what the best stuff is, madmen redefining the constructs that would otherwise enslave their vision). Themes drive (would-be) geniuses to the brink. I mean, one guy writes a story about turning into a cockroach that "revolutionizes" fiction, another dude writes a whole book about staring at his hand. WTF? The bigger you become the more shit they make up about you. You know, like Marx's children crawling up his legs begging for food and dying in his lap of starvation as he wrote the Grundrisse.

Irony is everywhere now that everything is undeniably poisoned.
I feel like that comic who died in the middle of his routine.
to the sound of mistaken laughter

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Posted: Wed May 01, 2019 7:34 pm
by Grizzly
Irony is everywhere now that everything is undeniably poisoned.
I feel like that comic who died in the middle of his routine.
to the sound of mistaken laughter
Wurd!

Since it hasn't been posted:

WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange Sentenced to 50 Weeks in Jail (wsj.com)
https://www.wsj.com/articles/wikileaks- ... 1556707610

---

just for shit's and grin's...


Re: The Wikileaks Question

Posted: Wed May 01, 2019 10:55 pm
by stickdog99
The Consul » 01 May 2019 23:19 wrote:
JackRiddler » Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:24 am wrote:Ah yes, I see. Zizek has kind of redefined philosopher, though I hope not enough to allow Molyneux under that umbrella. Though, I guess it's not really a redefinition. Messy wacko drugged up guy willing to say anything contrarian and perform stunt sophistry for the attention sounds like what philosophers have been going way back, I guess?
Socrates was in no small measure a fictional character who might possibly have been a likeable guy. Or not. I mean, which philosopher would YOU want to have a beer with?

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Posted: Wed May 01, 2019 11:27 pm
by stickdog99
liminalOyster » 01 May 2019 21:53 wrote:I find this admirable and sad:
I apologise unreservedly to those who consider that I have disrespected them by the way I have pursued my case.

This is not what I wanted or intended.

I found myself struggling with terrifying circumstances for which neither I nor those from whom I sought advice could work out any remedy.

I did what I thought at the time was the best and perhaps the only thing that could be done - which I hoped might lead to a legal resolution being reached between Ecuador and Sweden that would protect me from the worst of my fears.

I regret the course that this took; the difficulties were instead compounded and impacted upon very many others.

Whilst the difficulties I now face may have become even greater, nevertheless it is right for me to say this now.
Assange's sentencing statement from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-48118908
50 weeks in jail for skipping bail? Without any credit for time already effectively served?

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Posted: Thu May 02, 2019 3:41 am
by RocketMan
stickdog99 » Thu May 02, 2019 6:27 am wrote:
liminalOyster » 01 May 2019 21:53 wrote:I find this admirable and sad:
I apologise unreservedly to those who consider that I have disrespected them by the way I have pursued my case.

This is not what I wanted or intended.

I found myself struggling with terrifying circumstances for which neither I nor those from whom I sought advice could work out any remedy.

I did what I thought at the time was the best and perhaps the only thing that could be done - which I hoped might lead to a legal resolution being reached between Ecuador and Sweden that would protect me from the worst of my fears.

I regret the course that this took; the difficulties were instead compounded and impacted upon very many others.

Whilst the difficulties I now face may have become even greater, nevertheless it is right for me to say this now.
Assange's sentencing statement from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-48118908
50 weeks in jail for skipping bail? Without any credit for time already effectively served?
They don't bother to even pretend. The fix is in. Next up, they're going to railroad the extradition. I sure hope the legal team is in tip top shape.

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Posted: Sat May 04, 2019 3:06 am
by Grizzly
Image
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/julian-assa ... ve-revenge
Julian Assange’s father says WikiLeaks founder a victim of 'vindictive revenge'

Ya think!?

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Posted: Sat May 04, 2019 4:43 am
by Grizzly
This was taken of Linus moments before he was arrested for espionage

Image

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Posted: Sun May 05, 2019 2:28 pm
by alloneword
Interesting MSNBC poll asking the question: "Should Julian Assange be prosecuted for his involvement in WikiLeaks?"
msnbc-poll.png

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 12:22 am
by Grizzly
Image

This needs more eyeballs ...
Why The Intercept Really Closed the Snowden Archive - A Tale in Five Leaked Documents
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/com ... e_snowden/