Canadian_Watcher's Ban Decision Poll
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
- Searcher08
- Posts: 5887
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:21 am
Canadian_Watcher's Ban Decision Poll
My judgement was to get this up rather than leave it hanging.
The issue of this type of Polling in the future and it's codification is an additional conversation.
SLAD's issue of the Firepit and flammable threads seems another further conversation.
The issue of this type of Polling in the future and it's codification is an additional conversation.
SLAD's issue of the Firepit and flammable threads seems another further conversation.
-
Hunter
- Posts: 1455
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:10 pm
- spambot: no
Re: Canadian_Watcher's Ban Decision Poll
Very well done and simple, I think you did it just right, good job. We will see how it goes, should be interesting.
- barracuda
- Posts: 12890
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
- Location: Niles, California
Re: Canadian_Watcher's Ban Decision Poll
I'm boycotting this farce. Could someone post running totals so conscientious non-participants and unregistered lurkers might observe on the edge of their seat?
-
slimmouse
- Posts: 6129
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
- Location: Just outside of you.
Re: Canadian_Watcher's Ban Decision Poll
The mods decided to ban, the animals revolted, whilst the fish jumped out of the pond and shouted "boycott". The mouse squeaked.
Anyone else read Orwells "animal- farm- on-steroids "?
Anyone else read Orwells "animal- farm- on-steroids "?
Last edited by slimmouse on Sun Jul 21, 2013 3:43 pm, edited 3 times in total.
- justdrew
- Posts: 11966
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
- spambot: no
- Location: unknown
- Contact:
Re: Canadian_Watcher's Ban Decision Poll
barracuda » 21 Jul 2013 12:19 wrote:I'm boycotting this farce. Could someone post running totals so conscientious non-participants and unregistered lurkers might observe on the edge of their seat?
just vote.
an abstain option would have been good, but too late, no biggie.
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
-
Hunter
- Posts: 1455
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:10 pm
- spambot: no
Re: Canadian_Watcher's Ban Decision Poll
barracuda » Sun Jul 21, 2013 3:19 pm wrote:I'm boycotting this farce. Could someone post running totals so conscientious non-participants and unregistered lurkers might observe on the edge of their seat?
4 to 3 in favor of lifting ban right now.
- barracuda
- Posts: 12890
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
- Location: Niles, California
Re: Canadian_Watcher's Ban Decision Poll
Thank you for the early returns, Hunter. I now see that I can view the results without voting, so it's all good. I never knew that before today.
I am learned sumthing from this!!
I am learned sumthing from this!!
- Project Willow
- Posts: 4798
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 9:37 pm
- Location: Seattle
- Contact:
Re: Canadian_Watcher's Ban Decision Poll
Since this is essentially an appeal to the mods, it belongs in the ask admin sub forum. I'll put a notice in the other thread.
-
Hunter
- Posts: 1455
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:10 pm
- spambot: no
Re: Canadian_Watcher's Ban Decision Poll
We got a tight race at 9 to 5 in favor of lifting ban with 1% of the precients reporting and Nate Silver suggesting there is a good chance the repub...err the inmates may take over the asylum this election.
Source:
http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/07/15/nate-sil ... p-in-2014/
Source:
http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/07/15/nate-sil ... p-in-2014/
-
American Dream
- Posts: 19946
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
- Location: Planet Earth
Re: Canadian_Watcher's Ban Decision Poll
A boycott is as good as it gets to me...
- compared2what?
- Posts: 8383
- Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Re: Canadian_Watcher's Ban Decision Poll
slimmouse » Sun Jul 21, 2013 2:24 pm wrote:The mods decided to ban, the animals revolted, whilst the fish jumped out of the pond and shouted "boycott". The mouse squeaked.
Anyone else read Orwells "animal- farm- on-steroids "?
If he'd shouted boycott or made any kind of attempt to quash the idea that went beyond saying he thought it was a bad one and why, you'd have a point.
But I really mean that very mildly. Your loyalty and good intentions are very evident, and they do you credit. So there's no cause for anything but pride on your part, imo. I'm just saying.
...
I'm not sure I'm going to vote, either, tbh. I'd prefer that it be resolved with her being reinstated. But I've already said that.
And there's no "Yes, every possible effort should be made by all parties to achieve a fairer and happier outcome, even though that probably means everybody accepting compromises they might rather not have to make" option.
I guess I have to think it through.
“If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and 50 dollars in cash I don’t care if a Drone kills him or a policeman kills him.” -- Rand Paul
- OP ED
- Posts: 4673
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 10:04 pm
- Location: Detroit
Re: Canadian_Watcher's Ban Decision Poll
OP ED couldn't vote. it said OP ED's form was invalid. whatever that means.
but OP ED was trying to vote against a ban.
of course, that is only because OP ED enjoys endless conflict.
but OP ED was trying to vote against a ban.
of course, that is only because OP ED enjoys endless conflict.
Giustizia mosse il mio alto fattore:
fecemi la divina podestate,
la somma sapienza e 'l primo amore.
:: ::
S.H.C.R.
fecemi la divina podestate,
la somma sapienza e 'l primo amore.
:: ::
S.H.C.R.
-
Hunter
- Posts: 1455
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:10 pm
- spambot: no
Re: Canadian_Watcher's Ban Decision Poll
OP ED » Sun Jul 21, 2013 5:09 pm wrote:OP ED couldn't vote. it said OP ED's form was invalid. whatever that means.
but OP ED was trying to vote against a ban.
of course, that is only because OP ED enjoys endless conflict.
Interesting, who is trying to cull voters from the rolls and influence election results?
Any other reports of people being denied the ability to vote, identifications not being accepted, people being told they are listed as deceased and therefore refused a ballot?
- brainpanhandler
- Posts: 5127
- Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:38 pm
Re: Canadian_Watcher's Ban Decision Poll
barracuda » Sun Jul 21, 2013 2:19 pm wrote:I'm boycotting this farce. Could someone post running totals so conscientious non-participants and unregistered lurkers might observe on the edge of their seat?
I'm not even sure what I'm voting for. Are we voting on: "Should Jeff and TheMods be asked to re-consider their permanent ban on Canadian_Watcher?"
or are we voting as to whether to 1) No. overturn the decision by the mods or 2) Yes! keep the integrity of the ban in place.
See what I did there?
"Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." - Martin Luther King Jr.
-
Hunter
- Posts: 1455
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:10 pm
- spambot: no
Re: Canadian_Watcher's Ban Decision Poll
I am toing to go ahead and predict that this poll will tell us something when it is all over with.