guards seize British 'dirty bomb' lorry heading for Iran
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
- Et in Arcadia ego
- Posts: 4104
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:06 pm
- Location: The Void
guards seize British 'dirty bomb' lorry heading for Iran
<!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Outcry as border guards seize British 'dirty bomb' lorry heading for Iran<br>By JASON LEWIS, The Mail on Sunday 22:00pm 22nd July 2006<br></strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Border guards seized a British lorry on its way to make a delivery to the Iranian military - after discovering it was packed with radioactive material that could be used to build a dirty bomb.<br><br>The lorry set off from Kent on its way to Tehran but was stopped by officials at a checkpoint on Bulgaria's northernborder with Romania after a scanner indicated radiation levels 200 times above normal.<br><br>The lorry was impounded and the Bulgarian Nuclear Regulatory Agency (NPA) was called out.<br><br>On board they found ten lead-lined boxes addressed to the Iranian Ministry of Defence. Inside each box was a soil-testing device, containing highly dangerous quantities of radioactive caesium 137 and americium-beryllium.<br><br>The soil testers had been sent to Iran by a British firm with the apparent export approval of the Department of Trade and Industry. <br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=397124&in_page_id=1770">More..</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>Holy crap.. <p>____________________<br>Oderint, dum metuant</p><i></i>
-
greencrow0
- Posts: 1481
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:42 pm
Re: guards seize British 'dirty bomb' lorry heading for Iran
Why would Iran get a 'dirty bomb' from the UK when it is in a partnership with Russia for its nuclear reactor.<br><br>Does not compute...except as providing a <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>causes belli</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END-->?<br><br>GC <p></p><i></i>
-
slimmouse
- Posts: 6129
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
- Location: Just outside of you.
Re: Snatch and archive
<br> Snatch and archive this EIA<br><br> You know, just in case <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START ;) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif ALT=";)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br> Let me guess the UK govnt reaction ;<br><br> "AL QUAEDA infiltrates British business" <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
-
bvonahsen
Re: Snatch and archive
<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>In August last year there was a similar incident when a Turkish truck carrying a ton of zirconium silicate supplied by a British firm was stopped by Bulgarian customs at the Turkish border on its way to Tehran, after travelling from Britain, through Germany and Romania, without being stopped.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>Apparently the Bulgarians have their shit together.<br><br>And really, would it be that hard for the Brits to put a few controls on known radioactive and hazardous materials? Especially when the recipient is Iran? Unless of course, you <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>want</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> them to get it. A dirty bomb landin in Israel would be all it would take to kick this thing into high gear now wouldn't it? <p></p><i></i>
-
4911
- Posts: 673
- Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 9:34 pm
Re: Snatch and archive
why not fly it over directly to Teheran using a commercial cargo carrier? That makes no sense to make the same mistake twice... <p></p><i></i>
-
AlicetheCurious
- Posts: 570
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 7:45 am
Re: Snatch and archive
<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>That makes no sense to make the same mistake twice...<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Unless the mental and moral midgets behind the US/UK/Zionist policy planners are unable to think except in a monotonous, deadly loop, repeating itself over and over and over and over and over, drowning out the anguished screams of their victims... <p></p><i></i>
-
4911
- Posts: 673
- Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 9:34 pm
Re: Snatch and archive
I dont think theyre sooo stupid. The whole thing is a pretty ingenious plan, if viewed from a pre-911 perspective. Dont underestimate these people. Theyre not stupid. They only pretend to be. Its part of the strategy. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=4911>4911</A> at: 7/23/06 4:03 am<br></i>
-
blanc
- Posts: 1946
- Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:00 pm
sounds familiar
sounds like a re-run of the british firms supplying iraq scenario. <p></p><i></i>
- Seamus OBlimey
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 4:14 pm
- Location: Gods own country
Re: sounds familiar
WMD, Yellowcake, Dirty Bomb. Warmongers scaremongering.<br><br>Nowhere in that article does it say that the devices were ordered by Iran, only sent by an anonymous UK co. with the approval of the DTI.<br><br>Suspicious? You should be when the Mail has an exclusive like this. Anyone seen it anywhere else? <p></p><i></i>
- Seamus OBlimey
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 4:14 pm
- Location: Gods own country
Re: sounds familiar
A quick search at google news throws up more of the same...<br><br>"Hezbollah poised to fire warheads of spent nuclear rods<br><br>The nose cones will contain spent nuclear rods from Iran’s nuclear programme."<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.israpundit.com/2006/?p=1938">link</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>Though I wasn't aware the Iranian nuclear programme was advanced enough to produce spent fuel yet.<br><br>And...<br><br>"Islamists will set off dirty bomb<br><br>Spy chiefs fear that it is a case of "when, not if" Islamist terrorists launch a "dirty bomb" attack against London or another western capital, The Sunday ..."<br><br>Telegraph.co.uk, United Kingdom - Jun 24, 2006<br><br>Sorry I can't provide a link for this one but the Telegraph site seems to be down just now.<br><br>This is scary because "when, not if" is exactly what they were saying just before 7/7. When, not if we decide i'ts necessary? <p></p><i></i>