by Dreams End » Thu Mar 02, 2006 2:59 am
No, you know what. I'm not gonna let it go like that. For months I've been often one of the only people calling posters on these cryptofascist conspiracy theories. Sorry if anyone got their feelings hurt but it's important. <br><br>When you do that, you get called names. That's part of the deal here. I've been called Talmud merchant, agent of the NWO, Freemason (look anti, I used the word!) and even told to go and die. By a self professed Christian, no less. <br><br>And it's not just about hating Jews. It's perfectly possible to buy into one of these theories without knowing its origins. I get that. But when someone points out these origins, and you keep posting the same stuff, then you kinda lose that ignorance defense.<br><br>EVERY TIME I have criticized posts including info on Larouche, Heinberg, Mullins, Icke and whoever else, I've included large amounts of original source material from the person in question. So then people complain I'm "wallpapering". Actually, coming from Anti with the single largest number of posts in his OWN thread, (guess that's why they call it "data dump") this made me laugh. At least I'm quoting the people I'm trying to expose and not myself. That's how we Freemasons roll, dog.<br><br>Go do the freaking searches...you'll see it. I got on Hugh's case..because he quoted Larouche approvingly. It took several posts worth of quotes from Larouche himself before Hugh (then Watchful Citizen) and also Robert Reed to see that Larouche is not a good guy. I told watchful I'd ask one time if he was part of the Larouche organization and drop it after he answered. He did, and I did. Seemed gentlemanly enough to me at the time. <br><br>And I'm sorry, Hugh, that you still fail to see the significance of the baseball bats, so let me be clearer so you can understand why this is important. It's not because of some friend..that's just how I confirmed the story. Generally speaking, when people go around beating up the oppositionto the state with baseball bats, they work for the state. Get it? And since Larouche bragged of providing intel to the Reagan administration, I'd say he wasn't even interested in distancing himself from that accusation. <br><br>With a 60,000 square foot publishing house...one wonders where his money comes from. Well, I don't wonder...but some people should.<br><br>I'd also say to some fine posters on here that I sure appreciate others taking the heat I've often taken. Qutb particularly has shown me how to do it with patience and class...He has endured more sustained personal attacks and agent baiting than anyone on this board. Water off a duck's back. You are a zen master, my friend. <br><br>Gouda and both of our "star" people have also given us models of reasoned, logical and well supported discourse, whether or not I always agree with them. Oh, I know, we dont' ALWAYS have to post in that vein, but when putting out theories about very dark stuff, it's good to have some evidence and logic backing you up. And there are others here I'm just coming to know to grab their threads when they open up. Nomo has had some good stuff here recently and chiggerbit...and I also appreciated bio's willingness to put forward the idea that people can be ritually abused or subject of mc type activities AND the illuminati can be misinformation. Yeah, you don't have to accept the latter if you accept the former. <br><br>And lots of others I've enjoyed reading. I don't know what annalivia's situation is...or how she relates to the shifting sceneshifters...but she's not her usual lively self. (She was just a young thin pale soft shy slim slip of a thing then, sauntering, by silvamoonlake...) I may never know exactly who Ruth is, though I'm pretty sure I'd like to). <br><br>And thank you Jeff for finally taking this on directly. I admit I've wanted stronger statements from you in the past, but now I think I am not so sure. The only way to deal with this now is so time intensive that I don't really know how you'll manage. <br><br>And I'm sorry for the personal attacks and attempts to discredit you that will ensue from opening this up publicly. I know you can deal with it, but it still sucks. <br><br>Finally, I'm sorry you used proldic's firepitted thread as an example of how you are "fair and balanced" vis "unsupported slurs of fascist". He had a temper...but what he did was so mild compared to what several of us have let slip by so as not to go whining to you all the time. even just in this thread you see it. The accusations of certain of us "working for the NWO" go unabated and barely disguised. And by the way, congratulations to Qutb who now has more accusations of being an agent than I do. Also, I'm proud of the accusation that he, I and proldic were the same person. I'll take that company, any day. <br><br> We're big boys and girls and we don't need to run to you with every such abuse...but it's sad to see the comparison made between this rather consistent smear campaign and proldic's overzealous attempts to be the only OTHER poster at the time who bothered to take this stuff on. <br><br>And I hope you'll keep it up, Jeff. I notice that you took your link to Jeff Rense off your links list...and I wish you'd do stuff like that a bit more publicly, with some explanation. I think looking into Whatreallyhappened.com would be good as well. I think you are growing and evolving in your views like we all are. I hope I've been a part of that for you...you sure have been for me. (I won't ask you to reconsider the peak oil links...I know I'll never win that debate on this board...but I think that particular topic had some decent debate without involving agent accusations. Mostly.) Special kudos for the very risky posts about Levander and Ramsey Clark and the one on the fascist conspiracy theories. I know those were challenging.<br><br>And I might have to take some issue with Pan...yeah, this board has only a few hundred registered members, but Jeff's blog has millions of hits. This board is one way to get at its credibility. To be honest, if I popped in today for the first time and saw much of this crap I would never have started posting. (save your applause anti and floyd) and I might have ignored Jeff's blog from then on to. Not making the conscious equation that "crazy posters = noncredible blog" but it would be there in the back of my head.<br><br>I don't know the truth behind the big picture. Wish I did. I've gotten some glimpses here...and tried to share some. Anyone who thinks they've got it all figured out is either misled, lying or delusional. The folks in power...they have been able to hold onto it for a reason. They aren't stupid. They don't put their secrets out there for any Joe Blogger to see and they tend to knock off the few who really are getting close. <br><br>I know I'M not that close. All I ever find underneath my questions are more questions.<br><br> oh...but what questions they are..........<br><br>For the record...this isn't a "goodbye forever" post. So I reserve the right to pop in when I feel like it and say hello. But man, I've had enough for now. <br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>